Xgoals
xG Guide · Part 3 · Chapter 23

OBV and VAEP

The next step after xG and xT: value every action on the ball, including tackles and clearances, by how it changes the chance of scoring and of conceding.

Two models, one idea

VAEP (KU Leuven, 2019–2020)

Valuing Actions by Estimating Probabilities: for each action, the change in the chance of scoring soon minus the change in the chance of conceding soon.

OBV (StatsBomb, 2021)

On-Ball Value: the same aim, built on StatsBomb's richer data, and designed to judge the action itself rather than the team around it.

+0.01keeperpass+0.02centre-backcarry+0.03passinto midfield-0.05lostthe ball+0.04tacklewins it back+0.09throughball+0.06shot
+0.01keeper pass+0.02centre-back carry+0.03pass into midfield-0.05lost the ball+0.04tackle wins it back+0.09through ball+0.06shot
An example move: each action adds or removes a little value; a lost ball costs, a tackle that wins it back adds. Values are illustrative.

What they add

The debate

StatsBomb argues that models using the history of a possession can import team strength: a pass by a strong team's player looks better because his team usually scores. VAEP's authors weigh these choices differently. Both are newer and less standard than xG, and values are not comparable between them.

Questions

Is OBV the same as xG?

No. xG values shots; OBV and VAEP value every on-ball action by its effect on the chances of scoring and conceding.

Sources

  1. Decroos et al.: VAEP (IJCAI 2020) · 2020
  2. StatsBomb: On-ball value (OBV) · 2021

Checked 2026-10-28. Methods change: every figure here is dated to its source.

xG explains football; it is not a betting tip. 18+ · Please gamble responsibly.